Sign In‎ | New Login

  Kata Biblon
Greek New Testament and Wiki English Translation

Luke 3:23 Revision History

RevisionDateUserActionCommentWorld English Bible‎ / Wiki English TranslationUndo
8Monday, 09-Mar-2015 03:18:46 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began (to teach), was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary. Firstly, it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces Jesus' geneology to David through David's successor Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through Solomon's older brother Nathan. Secondly, Luke tells his birth narrative from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, Luke from the outset states that Jesus is only assumed to be the son of Joseph. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus (and that Heli is Jesus' maternal grandfather), and the entire lineage through Adam must likewise be understood, such that son of God in 3:38 —which would be blasphemous if it referred to Adam—refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
7Monday, 09-Mar-2015 03:16:24 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began (to teach), was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary. Firstly, it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces Jesus' geneology to David through David's successor Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through Solomon's older brother Nathan. Secondly, Luke tells the birth narrative from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, from the outset Luke states that Jesus is only assumed to be the son of Joseph. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus (and that Heli is Jesus' maternal grandfather), and so must the entire lineage through Adam be understood such that son of God in 3:38 —would be blasphemous if it referred to Adam—likewise refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
6Monday, 09-Mar-2015 03:06:51 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began (to teach), was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary. Firstly, it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces Jesus' geneology to David through David's successor Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through Solomon's older brother Nathan. Secondly, Luke tells the birth narrative from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, Luke from the outset states that Jesus is only assumed to be the son of Joseph. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus (and that Heli is Jesus' maternal grandfather), and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, and son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it referred to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
5Monday, 09-Mar-2015 02:51:27 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began (to teach), was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary. Firstly, it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces Jesus' geneology to David through David's successor Solomon, Luke traces his geneology to David through Solomon's older brother Nathan. Secondly, Luke's birth narrative is told from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, Luke from the outset states that Jesus is only assumed to be the son of Joseph. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica holds that Mary is the daughter of Heli and argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus, and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, such that son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it refered to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
4Monday, 09-Mar-2015 02:47:18 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began (to teach), was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary. Firstly, it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces the geneology to David through David's son Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through David's son Nathan. Secondly, Luke's birth narrative is told from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, Luke from the outset states that Jesus is only assumed to be the son of Joseph. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica holds that Mary is the daughter of Heli and argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus, and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, such that son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it refered to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
3Monday, 09-Mar-2015 02:41:48 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began to teach, was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary, firstly because it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces the geneology to David through David's son Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through David's son Nathan. Secondly, Luke's birth narrative is told from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, because Luke from the outset state that Jesus is not the son of Joseph, but only assumed to be. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica holds that Mary is the daughter of Heli and argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus, and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, such that son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it refered to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
2Monday, 09-Mar-2015 02:41:01 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began to teach, was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary, firstly because it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces the geneology to David through David's son Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through David's son Nathan. Secondly, Luke's birth narrative is told from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, because Luke from the outset state that Jesus is not the son of Joseph, but only assumed to be. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica holds that Mary is the daughter of Heli and argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus, and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, such that son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it refered to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)
1Monday, 09-Mar-2015 02:39:27 EDTtmoore1008 [Send Message]NEW¶Jesus himself, when he began to teach, was about thirty years old, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli,[a]
———
a Luke's geneology is argued to be the geneology of Mary, firstly because it differs from Matthew: whereas Matthew traces the geneology to David through David's son Solomon, Luke traces the geneology to David through David's son Nathan. Secondly, Luke's birth narrative is told from the perspective of Mary (see 1:26-56; 2:19; 2:48). Thirdly, because Luke from the outset state that Jesus is not the son of Joseph, but only assumed to be. John Lightfoot (1602-1675), in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica holds that Mary is the daughter of Heli and argues that son of Heli must be understood not to refer to Joseph, but to Jesus, and likewise the entire lineage through Adam, such that son of God in 3:38 would be blasphemous if it refered to Adam, and so refers to Jesus, bringing Luke's narrative full circle back to 3:22 in which the voice out of Heaven declares to Jesus You are my beloved son. (To wit: Jesus, the supposed son of Joseph, is the son of Heli; the son of David; the son of Adam; and finally the son of God.)